[Openinfralabs] Prometheus long-term storage

Marcel Hild mhild at redhat.com
Fri Apr 3 16:15:41 UTC 2020


Ok :(
But it's a great example of why an open-cloud would make sense, so that the
thanos folks could look at the blocks.



On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:03 PM Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:52:08PM +0200, Marcel Hild wrote:
> > Sorry, can't help here :(
> > Probably good to open an issue at the upstream project...
>
> It's been tried before...
>
> https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos/issues/469
>
> It's a litany of "I'm also having the same problem" comments with no
> upstream response.  This is why I'm looking for folks who have
> experience with something other than Thanos :).
>
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:31 PM Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0200, Marcel Hild wrote:
> > > > You should have 2 additional components running all the time. A
> `compact`
> > > > component, that, well, compacts. And then a `verify`, which also can
> > > repair
> > > > blocks.
> > >
> > > Right. It's the "compact" component that is throwing the error, and
> > > the "thanos bucket verify --repair" process just throws up its hands:
> > >
> > >   msg="repair is not implemented for this issue"
> issue=overlapped_blocks
>
> --
> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars at redhat.com> | larsks @ {irc,twitter,github}
> http://blog.oddbit.com/                | N1LKS
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/openinfralabs/attachments/20200403/9eabc1d3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Openinfralabs mailing list