[Openinfralabs] openinfralabs.org repo
Daitzman, Michael S
msd at bu.edu
Thu May 7 15:28:17 UTC 2020
Just added you both to the gitlab repository as developers.
Can you tell us more about the benefits of keeping it on Netlify vs. using gitlab static pages?
Michael Daitzman (He/Him)
msd at bu.edu
On 5/6/20, 5:02 PM, "Jimmy McArthur" <jimmy at openstack.org> wrote:
We ran into some snags, so things took a bit longer than anticipated.
However, the new version of the site is up - including ability to add
additional pages to the nav and a blogging option, should you desire.
The site is running off of Netlify using Gatsby as the static site
generator and the React framework.
You can check out the updates here:
In order to move this over to gitlab, we'd like to ask for the following:
- Access to your gitlab repo for users jimmytipit and gcutrini
- Need to create an oauth app in gitlab for Netlify permissions
- Once we have access, we can update the repo and make sure we
incorporate the updates you've already made in gitlab
Once that's all done, we're here to help or happy to let you run free
with your repo as you see fit :)
Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote on 4/1/20 3:58 PM:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:02:29PM -0500, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
>> Thanks Michael! Can you give a brief overview of what your longterm
>> vision for the site is? I know there has been some discussion of a
>> possible blog, for example. How else would you see the site
> I think we should definitely plan on some sort of blog feature, since
> we'll probably want a place to post updates as various part of the
> project progress.
> I would vote for something of the "drop a markdown file into the correct
> folder" variety.
>> Wherever you want to repo to live is fine, but I'd like to make sure it
>> works with Netlify and our development team has access to help you manage
>> the back end. Additionally, our marketing team does a fair amount of the
>> updates via the Netlify CMS, so ensuring that's accessible and available for
>> those folks is important as well.
> I don't think we have a strong set of requirements at this point.
> Speaking almost exclusively for myself, because I haven't had the
> chance to touch base with anyone on this topic, I would prefer that:
> - The website lives alongside any other repositories we're
> - Changes to the website going through a CI and review process.
> - The website can be rendered using open source tooling through a CI
> pipeline associated with the repository.
> I don't know what sort of workflow you folks have around the site
> right but, but if it's not terribly complicated it would be great to
> move the site sources over to
> since this is where we'll be hosting other things.
> Hopefully Michael at least can chime in on this to confirm that I have
> not making things up.
More information about the Openinfralabs