Re: [service-announce] Re: opendevorg docker hub images moving to quay.io
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 20:12, Clark Boylan cboylan@sapwetik.org wrote:
The workarounds available are not great
Hi Clark,
If I only care about Ubuntu Jammy+ and podman (and quay.io of course), should I expect any issues? I am open to collaborating on this aspect.
Kind regards, Radek -yoctozepto
On Wed, May 24, 2023, at 11:22 AM, Radosław Piliszek wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 20:12, Clark Boylan cboylan@sapwetik.org wrote:
The workarounds available are not great
Hi Clark,
If I only care about Ubuntu Jammy+ and podman (and quay.io of course), should I expect any issues?
No issues for these cases. In particular podman can be configured to talk to mirrors for arbitrary image sources allowing speculative testing of those images to be performed transparently in the CI system. Additionally Jammy has packages for podman that don't rely on the Kubic repo (older Ubuntu relies on Kubic and Kubic is deprecated for those platforms).
I am open to collaborating on this aspect.
Our plan in OpenDev is to switch gears towards moving deployments to podman. Once we are not reliant on Docker then we can switch the image hosting anywhere we like.
Kind regards, Radek -yoctozepto
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 20:28, Clark Boylan cboylan@sapwetik.org wrote:
No issues for these cases. In particular podman can be configured to talk to mirrors for arbitrary image sources allowing speculative testing of those images to be performed transparently in the CI system. Additionally Jammy has packages for podman that don't rely on the Kubic repo (older Ubuntu relies on Kubic and Kubic is deprecated for those platforms).
Thanks, Clark, for confirming.
I am open to collaborating on this aspect.
Our plan in OpenDev is to switch gears towards moving deployments to podman. Once we are not reliant on Docker then we can switch the image hosting anywhere we like.
Excuse my lack of insight but does it mean that you are relying on Ubuntu pre-Jammy somewhere for testing the resulting images? And that your plan might actually be to upgrade to Jammy everywhere?
Radek -yoctozepto
On 2023-05-24 20:32:33 +0200 (+0200), Radosław Piliszek wrote: [...]
Excuse my lack of insight but does it mean that you are relying on Ubuntu pre-Jammy somewhere for testing the resulting images? And that your plan might actually be to upgrade to Jammy everywhere?
It's more that we're deploying many containers on Focal (and even Bionic) servers, so we need to also be able to test deploying on those platforms until such time as we've replaced those servers with newer ones.
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 20:36, Jeremy Stanley fungi@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2023-05-24 20:32:33 +0200 (+0200), Radosław Piliszek wrote: [...]
Excuse my lack of insight but does it mean that you are relying on Ubuntu pre-Jammy somewhere for testing the resulting images? And that your plan might actually be to upgrade to Jammy everywhere?
It's more that we're deploying many containers on Focal (and even Bionic) servers, so we need to also be able to test deploying on those platforms until such time as we've replaced those servers with newer ones.
Understood, thanks.
Radek -yoctozepto
participants (3)
-
Clark Boylan
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
Radosław Piliszek