We will meet at 19:00 UTC on February 1, 2022 in #opendev-meeting with this agenda: == Agenda for next meeting == * Announcements ** OpenInfra Summit CFP needs your input: https://openinfra.dev/summit/ ** Service Coordinator nomination time has begun. You have until February 8, 2022 * Actions from last meeting * Specs Review * Topics ** Improving OpenDev's CD throughput (clarkb 20220201) *** Bootstrapping bridge via Zuul is now a complicated subject. Can use zuul secrets to make it happen. Are we comfortable with this? *** https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/infra-specs/+/821645 -- spec outlining some of the issues with secrets *** https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/821155 -- sample of secret writing; more info in changelog ** Container maintenance (clarkb 20220201) *** https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/opendev-container-maintenance *** Running container with dedicated users. Next up all the ircbots. *** Upgrading Zookeeper *** Upgrading MariaDB *** Eventually convert MariaDB container's from uid 999 to something that makes more sense on the system. ** Spring cleaning our Nodepool images (clarkb 20220201) *** http://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/service-announce/2021-December/000029.htm... cleanup announcement *** Changes to remove CentOS 8 are up. Are we ready to go ahead with this? In order they should be merged: **** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/827183 **** https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/base-jobs/+/827181 **** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/827184 **** https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/827186 ** Spring cleaning for old reviews? (frickler 20220201) *** system-config has >300 open reviews, most of them in merge-conflict and >1y old *** Do we see value in keeping those or could we run some script to auto-abandon those with a helpful comment? *** Neutron has a script that could be easily adopted for this task **** https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron/src/branch/master/tools/abandon_old_re... *** Clarkb to produce a list of repos that can be retired. We can then retire the repos and abandon their open reviews as step 0 ** Gerrit mergeabilityComputationBehavior (frickler 20220127) *** https://gerrit-documentation.storage.googleapis.com/Documentation/3.5.0/conf... *** This was disabled while upgrading to 3.4.0 since the default is "NEVER" *** We could set the option to "API_REF_UPDATED_AND_CHANGE_REINDEX" to restore the previous behavior *** It doesn't look like we have to have any concerns in regard to CPU load http://cacti.openstack.org/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=70348&rra_id=all ** Gerrit bugs/issues that we are tracking (clarkb 20220201) *** ACLs for pushing signed tags are ignored. Should be fixed in 3.4 now. https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/827153 will update our images. *** URL substititions for gitweb urls does not properly include the hash which is needed by gitea. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=15589 *** Backlog of ssh git pulls against Gerrit slows Zuul down. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=15649 * Open discussion