Request for Wiki Assistance
Hi Zuul Community!
We had our recent Zuul post denied by the wikipedia community. It's not a huge surprise and it's notoriously difficult to get a "first post" up. If any of you have some Zuul expertise you could espouse in a wiki-like way, and/or some wikipedia juice/advice you could offer us, it would be greatly appreciated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zuul_(software)
You can read the bits at the top of the page about what we're doing wrong. A few things could help:
* More primary sources - by this they mean high value domains or qualified news sources in the industry * A variation on authors * I'm not sure how to address their contention that the entry reads like an advertisement, but I'm open to suggestions :)
Having a wiki page is a really big step towards making Zuul a more high profile open source CI and project gating alternative, so please let me know how you can help!
Cheers, Jimmy
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:46:36PM -0600, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
Hi Zuul Community!
We had our recent Zuul post denied by the wikipedia community. It's not a huge surprise and it's notoriously difficult to get a "first post" up. If any of you have some Zuul expertise you could espouse in a wiki-like way, and/or some wikipedia juice/advice you could offer us, it would be greatly appreciated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zuul_(software)
You can read the bits at the top of the page about what we're doing wrong. A few things could help:
- More primary sources - by this they mean high value domains or qualified
news sources in the industry
- A variation on authors
- I'm not sure how to address their contention that the entry reads like an
advertisement, but I'm open to suggestions :)
Having a wiki page is a really big step towards making Zuul a more high profile open source CI and project gating alternative, so please let me know how you can help!
I had a look at the entry for Ansible:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software)
Which seems to be okay, I guess we could follow something like that? For example:
2 Architecture 2.1 Design goals 2.2 services 2.3 job configuration 2.4 ansible integration
- Paul
Yep. I think that makes sense.
Paul Belanger mailto:pabelanger@redhat.com February 12, 2020 at 5:46 AM I had a look at the entry for Ansible:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software)
Which seems to be okay, I guess we could follow something like that? For example:
2 Architecture 2.1 Design goals 2.2 services 2.3 job configuration 2.4 ansible integration
- Paul
Jimmy McArthur mailto:jimmy@openstack.org February 11, 2020 at 7:46 PM Hi Zuul Community!
We had our recent Zuul post denied by the wikipedia community. It's not a huge surprise and it's notoriously difficult to get a "first post" up. If any of you have some Zuul expertise you could espouse in a wiki-like way, and/or some wikipedia juice/advice you could offer us, it would be greatly appreciated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zuul_(software)
You can read the bits at the top of the page about what we're doing wrong. A few things could help:
- More primary sources - by this they mean high value domains or
qualified news sources in the industry
- A variation on authors
- I'm not sure how to address their contention that the entry reads
like an advertisement, but I'm open to suggestions :)
Having a wiki page is a really big step towards making Zuul a more high profile open source CI and project gating alternative, so please let me know how you can help!
Cheers, Jimmy
Zuul-discuss mailing list Zuul-discuss@lists.zuul-ci.org http://lists.zuul-ci.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zuul-discuss
Hi everyone. I'm resurfacing this in the hopes that someone from the Zuul Community can help address some of the concerns about our rejected Zuul wiki [1].
Primarily "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability—that is, they do not show /significant/ coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in /published/, /reliable/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources, /secondary/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary sources that are /independent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_independent_sources/ of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference and learn about mistakes to avoid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sourcing_mistakes_%28notability%29 when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia."
I believe if we can address those issues, then the initial take that it "feels like an advertisement" would additionally be resolved.
Cheers, Jimmy
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zuul_(software)
Jimmy McArthur mailto:jimmy@openstack.org February 12, 2020 at 7:35 AM Yep. I think that makes sense.
Zuul-discuss mailing list Zuul-discuss@lists.zuul-ci.org http://lists.zuul-ci.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zuul-discuss Paul Belanger mailto:pabelanger@redhat.com February 12, 2020 at 5:46 AM I had a look at the entry for Ansible:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software)
Which seems to be okay, I guess we could follow something like that? For example:
2 Architecture 2.1 Design goals 2.2 services 2.3 job configuration 2.4 ansible integration
- Paul
Zuul-discuss mailing list Zuul-discuss@lists.zuul-ci.org http://lists.zuul-ci.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zuul-discuss Jimmy McArthur mailto:jimmy@openstack.org February 11, 2020 at 7:46 PM Hi Zuul Community!
We had our recent Zuul post denied by the wikipedia community. It's not a huge surprise and it's notoriously difficult to get a "first post" up. If any of you have some Zuul expertise you could espouse in a wiki-like way, and/or some wikipedia juice/advice you could offer us, it would be greatly appreciated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zuul_(software)
You can read the bits at the top of the page about what we're doing wrong. A few things could help:
- More primary sources - by this they mean high value domains or
qualified news sources in the industry
- A variation on authors
- I'm not sure how to address their contention that the entry reads
like an advertisement, but I'm open to suggestions :)
Having a wiki page is a really big step towards making Zuul a more high profile open source CI and project gating alternative, so please let me know how you can help!
Cheers, Jimmy
Zuul-discuss mailing list Zuul-discuss@lists.zuul-ci.org http://lists.zuul-ci.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zuul-discuss
participants (2)
-
Jimmy McArthur
-
Paul Belanger