[Edge-computing] Afterlife of the PTG edge discussions

Christopher Price christopher.price at est.tech
Thu Mar 1 16:14:08 UTC 2018

tldr; from my iPhone but the short answer I would give is:
Tricircle makes assumptions about hierarchy that don't seem to fit into our view of edge solutions.
We did discuss surveying options and if feasible approaching tricircle about extracting some pieces into a separate library/repo/project to serve both use cases.  I think that theoretical piece we called NKB.
The prerequisite to any concrete statement is the technical survey.

/ Chris

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: lebre.adrien at free.fr <lebre.adrien at free.fr>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 3:21:56 PM
To: Gergely Csatari (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Cc: edge-computing at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Edge-computing] Afterlife of the PTG edge discussions

> [..]
> - What is the difference between such a new NKB and the tricircle
> proposal (before splitting) [1] is also something I think it would be
> valuable to better understand?

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle_before_splitting

> - I didn't attend the nova session unfortunately this morning but I
> get the feeling that we can also learn a lot from the questions they
> have been discussing for more than two years regarding the cell V2
> architecture (see for instance [2] line 37 the discussion regarding
> glance for all cells vs one glance per cells vs....).

[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky

> [...]


Edge-computing mailing list
Edge-computing at lists.openstack.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/edge-computing/attachments/20180301/13fb18f3/attachment.html>

More information about the Edge-computing mailing list