Reevaluating choice of IRC network for our service bots
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Wed May 26 15:20:21 UTC 2021
---- On Mon, 24 May 2021 15:34:19 -0500 Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote ----
> On 2021-05-24 11:19:12 -0500 (-0500), Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> [...]
> > Does openinfra projects have their individual choice which one
> > they want to move or continue OR there will be only a single
> > network provided/supported by opendev based on the majority of
> > openinfra projects feedback.
> [...]
>
> Technically those are two separate questions, so I'll do my best to
> answer them both.
>
> OpenDev doesn't mandate communication choices for projects, you're
> always free to communicate where you like.
>
> However, OpenDev doesn't provide nor plan to provide services
> spanning multiple IRC networks, so we'll attempt to accommodate
> whichever network the majority of our projects are using. If that's
> Freenode then clearly we don't need to change anything. If it's OFTC
> then that's a contingency we've planned for, and we can execute a
> move of our services there fairly quickly. If it's some other IRC
> network then expect longer delays and a fair bit more work on our
> part.
>
> The fact that we've kept channels registered for everyone on OFTC is
> fairly significant, because that means we don't need to wrest
> control from anyone who might already be hanging out in them.
> Without that, some channels (particularly those not namespaced)
> could take years to get under our control, if ever.
> --
Thanks for the details.
In today TC ad-hoc meeting, we concluded in OpenStack that we are moving to OFTC
Details and agreement with action plan are below etherpad:
- https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-irc
-gmann
> Jeremy Stanley
>
More information about the service-discuss
mailing list